The Basics of Ukrainian Geophilosophy.
Keywords:
geofilosofiya, Ukraine, Russia, Moscow, Kiev, European culture, Asian culture, Kievan Rus, the Grand Principality of Moscow, the empireAbstract
To understand the true causes of the events that occurred and are occurring in Ukraine, throughout its history, it is necessary to understand the peculiarities of geophilosophy in the region. The author offered, the main feature of geophilosophy in this region, which forms the Ukrainian mentality for centuries, is that modern Ukraine is geographically located at the crossroads of two powerful cultures of Eurasian continent: Asian and European. The author has used the dialectical, system-structural, structural-functional research methods as well as methods of comparison, analysis and synthesis. The main contribution of the author in the study of this actual and complex topic is another attempt to of objective research of historical and cultural connections between Moscow and Kiev, Russians and Ukrainians. The novelty of the study - to show Ukraine and Ukrainians from the inside, with all their contradictions and trying to establish their own cultural markers of identity. According to the author, western researchers do not understand the important difference between Kyiv and Moscow, the Ukrainians and the Russians, which were always different, are different, and will be different, despite being at first sight a single nation and culture. It does not matter what we call the culture of The Grand Principality of Moscow, the legal successor of which is the Russian Federation: or “Russian Siberian” world culture, or “Orthodox civilisation”, or otherwise. It is important that Ukrainians do not see their place in this culture. Kyiv, as the ancient and richest cultural centre with a certain territory of influence, and the Ukrainians, as a guardian of their culture, claim (and not without reason) is not an appendage to the role of someone else’s culture, especially the culture of the earlier vassal of the Principality of Moscow, and the revival of an independent locus. Since the 13th century, the Ukrainians have been trying to reunite the old boundaries and achieve independence. For eight centuries, the attempts to revive the Russian state (in the understanding of Kyiv) arose repeatedly. For Ukrainians, the history of Kyivan Rus is an unquestionable shrine for them, and an inexhaustible source of the struggle for independence.References
Бердяев Н. А. Судьба России / Н. А. Бердяев. – М.: Советский писатель, 1990. – С. 127–128.
Горький М. А. Статьи 1905–1916 / М. А. Горький. – Петроград, 1918. – С. 174–187.
Гумилев Л. Н. От Руси до России: Очерки этнической истории / Л. Н. Гумилев. – М.: Рольф, 2001.
Тойнби А. Дж. Цивилизация перед судом истории (Сборник) / А. Дж. Тойнби. – М.: «Прогресс» «Культура», 1995.
Трубецкой Н. С. Наследие Чингисхана. Взгляд на русскую историю не с Запада, а с Востока / Н. С. Трубецкой. – М.: Алгоритм, ЭКСМО, 2012.
Шпенглер О. Закат Европы: Очерки морфологии мировой истории. Т. 1. Образ и действительность / О. Шпенглер. Пер. с нем. Н. Ф. Гарелин. – Минск: ООО «Попурри», 1998.
Шпенглер О. Закат Европы: Очерки морфологии мировой истории. Т. 2. Всемирно-исторические перспективы / О. Шпенглер. Пер. с нем. С. Э. Борич. – Минск: ООО «Попурри», 1999.
Curzon George. The place of India in the Empire. – London: J. Murray, 1909.
Huntington Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. – New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1996.